How are we going to deal with FOF-CT vs. FOF-GSML?

[strambc]

-- we are going to keep them separate either as two repo or preferentially as 1 well subdivided if that is possible to do while keeping independent versioning

two questions:

FOC-CT vs FOC-GSML?
I unchecked this item because I saw you added information about the difference between the two in the top-level README...

1. However, I remain curious about how we can point users to FOF-CT vs. FOF-GSML without them having to piece it together one table at a time.
2. I recommend having two different sub-directories we can link to from the top-level README.
3. BTW, part of this is confusing because I think we are trying to do two things in the same repo:
   -- Provide documentation and instructions
   -- Provide example data tables someone can download and use...

[strambc]

We might want to clarify what is the actual goal.

Numbering tables
Related to what is the use of this repo vs. usability, I think the tables should be numbered so that people know what is essential, what is recommended for each FOF-CT vs. FOF-GSML

I did not see a TABLES subdirectory in the source folder.
I thought we decided to do it...

Is this going to be implemented as part of #18 ?

@strambc that's right. The tables folder was added with #18 and contains csv files that generate File Header and Data Columns sections for each data table.