Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Negligible conflict in Railway. #6

Open
Vostro-08 opened this issue Jul 15, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Negligible conflict in Railway. #6

Vostro-08 opened this issue Jul 15, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@Vostro-08
Copy link

Please add railway.app compatibility as an alternative deployment platform. Thank you!

@AmirulAndalib
Copy link

Please add railway.app compatibility as an alternative deployment platform. Thank you!

get creative Simply Edit The Procfile Process to Web 😂😂

@Vostro-08
Copy link
Author

get creative Simply Edit The Procfile Process to Web 😂😂

Sorry! I almost forgot to update this issue with that. I tried to figure out what's wrong with the railway a long ago and discovered this fix at that time. But still confused why it can't fetch worker as the demanded process even if we declare it via Procfile and it always choose web as the default (the app is not that type). Anyway thank you for your interest in this topic 👍

@Vostro-08 Vostro-08 changed the title railway.app compatibility Negligible conflict in Railway. Jul 31, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants