You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While we have addressed the string size for RPT_ALINKS and RPT_LINKS, l->links are still limited to [5120]-1 characters.
In a large network (somewhere around 510 nodes depending on node name sizes) a network node could receive a link list larger than 5120 which will be truncated.
While not critical, evaluation of how the strings are stored and alternative methods should be reviewed at some point.
Reference PR #474 and PR #470
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Personally, I think this is a great candidate for using an ast_str. A fixed size buffer for something that can vary with essentially no bounds doesn't seem appropriate here.
While we have addressed the string size for RPT_ALINKS and RPT_LINKS, l->links are still limited to
[5120]-1
characters.In a large network (somewhere around 510 nodes depending on node name sizes) a network node could receive a link list larger than 5120 which will be truncated.
While not critical, evaluation of how the strings are stored and alternative methods should be reviewed at some point.
Reference PR #474 and PR #470
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: