Skip to content

Parameters of the paper's model #23

@gkrisp98

Description

@gkrisp98

Hi, I use the setup described in the script reproduce_paper_resuls.sh to reproduce paper's results, but the model I get has the following number of parameters:

| Name | Type | Params

0 | layers | ModuleList | 81.6 K
1 | output_layer | BRepNetFaceOutputLayer | 98.9 K
2 | classification_layer | Linear | 680

181 K Trainable params
0 Non-trainable params
181 K Total params
0.725 Total estimated model params size (MB)

And the following results:
DATALOADER:0 TEST RESULTS
{'test/Chamfer_iou': 0.8299525380134583,
'test/CutEnd_iou': 0.7150671482086182,
'test/CutSide_iou': 0.7787927389144897,
'test/ExtrudeEnd_iou': 0.8739719986915588,
'test/ExtrudeSide_iou': 0.9213229417800903,
'test/Fillet_iou': 0.978989839553833,
'test/RevolveEnd_iou': 0.5921052694320679,
'test/RevolveSide_iou': 0.7775700688362122,
'test/accuracy': 0.9383547306060791,
'test/mean_iou': 0.8084715604782104}

This is inconsistent with the results published in the paper, where the best performing model has 359k parameters and accuracy 92.52 ± 0.15 and IoU 77.10 ± 0.54. Can you tell me what I do wrong ?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions