You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Several years ago there was a PR to add support for GCS to use for storage. I'd like to request another feature review of adding GCS support.
Describe the benefits this would bring to existing BookStack users
Not every company, team, org uses AWS. Having more flexibility benefits everybody.
Can the goal of this request already be achieved via other means?
Yes, BookStack does support S3 compatible services like GCS. But it requires setting the GCS bucket to use a legacy access control called Fine-grained instead of the more secure Uniform. You also have to use Service account HMAC which uses Access Keys instead of either a normal GCP Service Account or, even better, Workload Identity.
Have you searched for an existing open/closed issue?
I have searched for existing issues and none cover my fundamental request
How long have you been using BookStack?
Under 3 months
Additional context
#5262 and #763 would also be great so that buckets don't need to be public.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the feature you'd like
Several years ago there was a PR to add support for GCS to use for storage. I'd like to request another feature review of adding GCS support.
Describe the benefits this would bring to existing BookStack users
Not every company, team, org uses AWS. Having more flexibility benefits everybody.
Can the goal of this request already be achieved via other means?
Yes, BookStack does support S3 compatible services like GCS. But it requires setting the GCS bucket to use a legacy access control called Fine-grained instead of the more secure Uniform. You also have to use Service account HMAC which uses Access Keys instead of either a normal GCP Service Account or, even better, Workload Identity.
Have you searched for an existing open/closed issue?
How long have you been using BookStack?
Under 3 months
Additional context
#5262 and #763 would also be great so that buckets don't need to be public.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: