Design discussion: OfflineDbContext #53
Closed
adrianhall
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments
-
Option #2: Using an On… protected function: public class MyOfflineDbContext(DbContextOptions<MyOfflineDbContext> options) : OfflineDbContext(options)
{
// Your offline data sets are defined as normal; you can also use OnModelCreating() as normal as long as you call base.
public DbSet<Movie> Movies => Set<Movie>();
// Use OnDatasyncInitialization() to set datasync settings
Protected override void OnDatasyncInitialization(DatasyncContextBuilder contextBuilder)
{
contextBuilder.SetHttpClient(new HttpClient() { BaseAddress = “https://my-datasync-server.azurewebsites.net/“ });
ContextBuilder.Entity<Movie>().SetUri(new Uri(“/tables/movies”, UriKind.Relative));
}
} (With apologies for capitalization - apparently, writing code on an iPad is hard) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Based on the complete lack of replies, I’m going to assume no-one cares as long as it works. I’m going to use Option 2 (above) - having a protected builder initialization method (which is how OnConfiguring and OnModelCreating work as well). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'd like to garner opinions on this API.
The new client will be centered around offline capabilities by requiring you to integrate into an Entity Framework Core DbContext - or rather a sub-class of it (called
OfflineDbContext
). Here is the proposed typical OfflineDbContext definition:If you want to pull the movies table, you can use:
If you want to use a query, you can use:
Thoughts on this overall flow for pulling data?
(And yes, pushing, I'll be covering remote table access and pushing tables in a later discussion)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions