Skip to content

How to handle implicit measures #46

@grosscol

Description

@grosscol

For speks in which no measure is defined, how to handle the performance annotations? Specifically, how to handle naming the list that holds the performance data when it is split by measure?

Split by measure returns a named list of data frames. The names are the @id of the measures. When there is one measure and no measure column, you get a list of "_:m1" = data. Multiple measures split the data as the name implies. However, for no measure in the spek, what to name the list?

The names of the list will be used when outputting the annotations. E.g. Positive Gap for "_:m1" where the name of the list is used to fill in the information about which measure the performance annotation pertains to.

  • Special logic for handling list without names
  • Special name (e.g. "null") indicating that no measure is to be identified which might be problematic downstream
  • Special instance of a measure defined in slowmo that is the "implict measure"
  • Insert default implicit measure into spek?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions