Skip to content

Review of the content: part 1 #24

@ashwinvis

Description

@ashwinvis

General comments

The following are only my personal perspective and not hard requirements to change. Feel free to take them into account or ignore it.

Welcome and Introduction

Training providers

  • Rename the title of the episode into "teaching philosophy". That is what is important to the learners. Otherwise it appears as promotional material 😅
  • Add a short paragraph something on why we are introducing these 3 providers. The first sentence is good enough if it can be moved up

ENCCS, CodeRefinery and The Carpentries all teach computational competences to learners through an applied approach founded on research-based teaching principles

Available lessons

These lessons are at different maturity levels and have been developed by many different people, so they do not all conform equally well to the recommendations presented in this lesson on best practice!

  • Clarify the intention of the episode.
    • Can we pick one lesson which we can show as a gold standard for the purpose of instructor training?
    • Are we showing this to allow instructors to select something that they are familiar with, in preparation for the next episode?

First teaching practice

teach” a topic close to your heart to your collaborator.

  • Are we allowing It should be from the ENCCS / Coderefinery library isn't it? Clarify that.
  • Add Recommended episodes similar to how Carpentries does. If the learners do not know which ones to pick.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions