Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Self Contained Management #5

Open
bradjtrammell opened this issue Mar 4, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

[Feature Request] Self Contained Management #5

bradjtrammell opened this issue Mar 4, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@bradjtrammell
Copy link

bradjtrammell commented Mar 4, 2025

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently, clients are required to log directly into the panel to make changes. The configuration in FossBilling primarily serves informational purposes, leaving clients with limited control over their services unless the client uses the panel itself.

Describe the solution you'd like
I propose a solution where clients can easily manage various services such as email (mailboxes, aliases, etc.), FTP accounts, site settings (PHP version, SSL certificate renewals, custom vhost settings, etc.), and DNS management (creating, deleting, and modifying assigned zones). This would provide clients with a more intuitive interface for managing their services. Currently, clients are forced to access the backend, which can be confusing for novice users and may lead to accidental changes that require the provider to intervene and revert.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Currently, there are no other viable alternatives to this approach.

@jaapmarcus
Copy link
Member

Use a web hosting panel instead I don't think it is reasonable to except this for a billing manager...

This wil mean we need to run al the other services in Fossbilling or implement 1 system fully and force ever body to use it..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants