-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Infinite continuations: sum(*) returns alternating rows forever #3096
Comments
We now know what the difference between mixed-mode and non-mixed results here is about (it's a testing artifact based on how the framework handles receiving Namely, this is a consequence of the fact that the
Then this repeats ad infinitum. This is something @pengpeng-lu noted in #3177 (for #3180). It's also notable that I think this should go away when #3107 can be done in 4.2, as this doesn't happen when |
Also notable: this happens for all aggregates, not just |
Actually, my comment about:
Led me to another discover: |
…te plan continuations There is missing state that was introduced to the `AggregateCursor` and its accompanying plan in FoundationDB#3092. However, this state was not added to the continuation, which results in unexpected behavior when we try to deserialize the plan's continuation (effectively, it reverts to the old behavior of the plan operator). We were already correctly _de_serializing this information, so the upshot is that any plan that is started after this current version should exhibit the correct behavior, but we get incorrect behavior when a plan is started on an older version. This fixes FoundationDB#3096.
…te plan continuations (#3211) There is missing state that was introduced to the `AggregateCursor` and its accompanying plan in #3092. However, this state was not added to the continuation, which results in unexpected behavior when we try to deserialize the plan's continuation (effectively, it reverts to the old behavior of the plan operator). We were already correctly _de_serializing this information, so the upshot is that any plan that is started after this current version should exhibit the correct behavior, but we get incorrect behavior when a plan is started on an older version. This fixes #3096. I was able to get test coverage of this part of the code by enabling `FORCE_CONTINUATIONS` mode on `aggregateIndexTests`.
…nating rows forever
…tion deserialization This cleans up the `StreamingAggregateCursor` and its helper classes to remove the `createDefaultIfEmpty` option. We'd been carrying that option around as we introduced that field in FoundationDB#3092 and wanted to preserve behavior when upgrading from older versions. The intention had been that all new plans would set the option starting in 4.1, but a bug (fixed in FoundationDB#3211; see FoundationDB#3096) means that we didn't actually enable it until 4.1.9.0. That means that after this change, we'd require 4.1.9.0 or newer in order to safely continue these queries. In theory, we could wait with this change, but 4.1.9.0 has enough fixes that I actually think our recommendation should be that anyone upgrading from 4.0 or below go straight to 4.1.9.0, and then they can proceed safely to a newer version with this change. I was able to validate that this change is compatible with 4.1.9.0 via the cross-version tests run during PRB. When I ran the full mixed mode tests with the `aggregate-index-tests.yamsql`, I found that only 4.1.9.0 worked, which is expected. This resolves FoundationDB#3092.
Adding maxRows:1 to the yaml test keeps returning two rows forever (the result row and an empty row), the continuation is never atEnd().
Steps To Reproduce:
Note that this behaves differently when running in mixed mode, where the error is:
Caused by: com.google.common.base.VerifyException
at com.google.common.base.Verify.verify(Verify.java:102)
at com.apple.foundationdb.relational.recordlayer.query.QueryPlan$ContinuedPhysicalQueryPlan.validatePlanAgainstEnvironment(QueryPlan.java:520)
at com.apple.foundationdb.relational.recordlayer.query.QueryPlan$PhysicalQueryPlan.executePhysicalPlan(QueryPlan.java:361)
at com.apple.foundationdb.relational.recordlayer.query.QueryPlan$PhysicalQueryPlan.executeInternal(QueryPlan.java:252)
at com.apple.foundationdb.relational.recordlayer.query.QueryPlan$PhysicalQueryPlan.executeInternal(QueryPlan.java:112)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: