Skip to content

Commit 44db044

Browse files
authored
Update 2025-08-04-purpose-of-writing.md
1 parent 7c0e3ac commit 44db044

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

_posts/2025-08-04-purpose-of-writing.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ interpret patterns, and reflect on limitations and implications. Lastly, methods
6666
2. If I were new to this study, what background would I need to replicate the work? Depending on the scale, detailed tables
6767
I present the steps I think is efficient and epistmoligically sounds and I will present debates thereafter
6868

69-
# Debate 1: Interim Analysis lead to Insight or Bias
69+
## Debate 1: Interim Analysis lead to Insight or Bias
7070
One ongoing debate in research design concerns interim analysis. Should we analyze data during the study to optimize resource use and gain early insight? Or should we avoid this to prevent bias and false discoveries?
7171

7272
In conventional paradigms, interim analysis is discouraged because it may lead to “double dipping”—inflating the chance of false positives. However, in domains where data are rare and precious—such
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ Thus, interim analysis may be reframed—not as hypothesis testing, but as hypot
7878
This reframing allows us to gain real-time insight while preserving transparency,
7979
provided it is carefully documented and clearly distinguished from confirmatory analysis.
8080

81-
# Debate 2: Introduction First, or Last?
81+
## Debate 2: Introduction First, or Last?
8282
Another philosophical fork arises: Should we write the introduction before or after analyzing results?
8383
Many researchers begin with results and then find an narrative that better articulate the result for introduction. But I recommend the opposite.
8484

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)