BCIO tool
Hello BCIO team,
I am sharing a new SSRN preprint that uses BCIO as a central reference point in a comparison of three solution classes in behavioural analysis:
• CAQDAS environments
• BCW / COM-B / TDF frameworks
• BCIO-grounded ontology-operational architecture
SSRN link:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6567078
The paper compares these classes in terms of what kind of analytical output they make possible:
• CAQDAS as descriptive infrastructure
• BCW / COM-B / TDF as theoretical explanation
• BCIO-grounded ontology-operational workflow as a route to modular localisation and action point
A central point of the paper is the distinction between official BCIO use as a procedurally segmented workflow and an ontology-operational workflow built on BCIO identifiers, where normalisation, candidate retrieval, neighbourhood checking, and module-fit control are internalised within a single analytical route.
The paper also discusses:
• BPMS–DREFS modular localisation
• modality as a second analytical layer after identification
• failure-type diagnosis
• and the use of BCIO identifiers not only for annotation, but for carrying analysis forward to intervention decision
I am posting this here because BCIO is a central component of the paper, and I would welcome any comments from the team on whether the description of BCIO use, workflow, or scope should be represented differently.
Best regards,
Oleksii Kartashov`
BCIO tool
Hello BCIO team,
I am sharing a new SSRN preprint that uses BCIO as a central reference point in a comparison of three solution classes in behavioural analysis:
• CAQDAS environments
• BCW / COM-B / TDF frameworks
• BCIO-grounded ontology-operational architecture
SSRN link:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6567078
The paper compares these classes in terms of what kind of analytical output they make possible:
• CAQDAS as descriptive infrastructure
• BCW / COM-B / TDF as theoretical explanation
• BCIO-grounded ontology-operational workflow as a route to modular localisation and action point
A central point of the paper is the distinction between official BCIO use as a procedurally segmented workflow and an ontology-operational workflow built on BCIO identifiers, where normalisation, candidate retrieval, neighbourhood checking, and module-fit control are internalised within a single analytical route.
The paper also discusses:
• BPMS–DREFS modular localisation
• modality as a second analytical layer after identification
• failure-type diagnosis
• and the use of BCIO identifiers not only for annotation, but for carrying analysis forward to intervention decision
I am posting this here because BCIO is a central component of the paper, and I would welcome any comments from the team on whether the description of BCIO use, workflow, or scope should be represented differently.
Best regards,
Oleksii Kartashov`