An example of AISA 11.1’s work on a TaTT-related prompt.

[oleksiikartashovde-glitch]

tatt_clean_links_for_bcio_team.json

tatt_data.xlsx

BCIO tool

Answer AISA 11.1

https://chatgpt.com/share/69dfe7c0-c98c-838d-be07-e7102b0769ba

Query
I need to increase attendance at first GP appointments among young adults.

Please use TaTT as the main basis for selection and map everything to the current ontology IDs from the loaded ontology package.

I need a practical answer for real use, not a theory essay.

Please do all of the following:
• identify the most relevant mechanisms of action (MoA) for this attendance problem;
• recommend the best starter BCTs to begin with;
• for each BCT, show:
• the TaTT number,
• the TaTT term,
• the primary ontology ID,
• the source ontology,
• the ontology label,
• any secondary ontology IDs,
• the mapping type (exact, near, split, bridge, or provisional),
• a short explanation of why it is suitable here;
• for each relevant MoA, show:
• the TaTT MoA number if available, otherwise the canonical TaTT MoA label,
• the primary ontology ID,
• the source ontology,
• the ontology label,
• any secondary ontology IDs,
• the mapping type,
• and why it matters for this case;
• separately recommend the most suitable:
• Mode of Delivery,
• Source,
• Style of Delivery,
also with their current ontology IDs, source ontology, and ontology labels;
• if a recommendation is raised through TaTT-based linkage, make that visible in the tables;
• if a mapping is provisional, mark it clearly as lower confidence.

Output format

Give the answer in tables only, with no long narrative before or after.

Table 1. Relevant mechanisms of action

Columns:
• priority
• TaTT MoA number / canonical TaTT label
• primary ontology ID
• source ontology
• ontology label
• secondary ontology IDs
• mapping type
• confidence note
• why this matters

Table 2. Recommended starter BCTs

Columns:
• priority
• TaTT number
• TaTT BCT
• primary ontology ID
• source ontology
• ontology label
• secondary ontology IDs
• mapping type
• confidence note
• linked MoA
• why recommended

Table 3. Delivery specification

Columns:
• component
• recommended term
• ontology ID
• source ontology
• ontology label
• why suitable

Components must include:
• Mode of Delivery
• Source
• Style of Delivery

Table 4. Final starter package

Columns:
• priority rank
• TaTT number
• BCT
• ontology ID
• source ontology
• main MoA
• mode of delivery
• source
• style of delivery
• practical note

Table 5. Short closing summary

Columns:
• closing item
• recommendation

Rows:
• Top 3 BCTs to start with
• Top 2 delivery options

Important rules
• use TaTT as the main basis for selection;
• do not restrict the output to BCIO only if a better or necessary mapping comes from another ontology in the loaded package;
• always show the source ontology;
• where the mapping is not one-to-one, show that explicitly;
• where a TaTT item has a number, do not omit it;
• where a TaTT MoA has no stable number, use the canonical TaTT label;
• keep the answer practical, concise, and tabular;
• do not write a long essay;
• do not hide uncertainty.