Here's an example of annoying output when evaluating an Imbalance model in a pipeline:
julia> evaluate!(mach, resampling=cv, measure=accuracy, verbosity=0)
julia> evaluate!(mach, resampling=cv, measure=accuracy, verbosity=0)
[ Info: After filtering, the mapping from each class to number of borderline points is ("colosa" => 21, "virginica" => 22).
[ Info: After filtering, the mapping from each class to number of borderline points is ("colosa" => 21, "virginica" => 22).
[ Info: After filtering, the mapping from each class to number of borderline points is ("colosa" => 17, "virginica" => 23).
[ Info: After filtering, the mapping from each class to number of borderline points is ("colosa" => 17, "virginica" => 23).
[ Info: After filtering, the mapping from each class to number of borderline points is ("colosa" => 20, "virginica" => 25).
[ Info: After filtering, the mapping from each class to number of borderline points is ("colosa" => 20, "virginica" => 25).
[ Info: After filtering, the mapping from each class to number of borderline points is ("colosa" => 11, "virginica" => 24).
[ Info: After filtering, the mapping from each class to number of borderline points is ("colosa" => 11, "virginica" => 24).
[ Info: After filtering, the mapping from each class to number of borderline points is ("colosa" => 19, "virginica" => 27).
[ Info: After filtering, the mapping from each class to number of borderline points is ("colosa" => 19, "virginica" => 27).
[ Info: After filtering, the mapping from each class to number of borderline points is ("colosa" => 16, "virginica" => 27).
[ Info: After filtering, the mapping from each class to number of borderline points is ("colosa" => 16, "virginica" => 27).
Here's an example of annoying output when evaluating an Imbalance model in a pipeline: