Skip to content

Conversation

@icweaver
Copy link
Member

@icweaver icweaver commented Apr 10, 2025

Closes #39

Looks like Bijector{N} --> Bijector now since TuringLang/Bijectors.jl#214

Relevant commit in v0.10.8..v0.11.0 diff: TuringLang/Bijectors.jl@0717e3e

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.68%. Comparing base (a91a38e) to head (b055ca8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #54   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.68%   90.68%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines         977      977           
=======================================
  Hits          886      886           
  Misses         91       91           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@abhro
Copy link
Member

abhro commented Apr 11, 2025

Nice. Thanks!

@abhro abhro merged commit ef3787d into main Apr 11, 2025
14 checks passed
@abhro abhro deleted the bijectors-compat branch April 11, 2025 13:11
@icweaver
Copy link
Member Author

Could you release a new version? I think tests on JuliaAstro are currently failing without it. Also, I have no idea how to register a new release 😅

@abhro
Copy link
Member

abhro commented Apr 12, 2025

Hi! I'll add a bump version soon. As for registering, I think one of the julia pkg websites say to use the registrator bot

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Causes problem with Integrals packet

2 participants