You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
You're talking mainly about the abstract block array interface, and not the concrete block array type, right? AFAICT, hierarchical matrices are block arrays where the blocks are different types, but this is staged for performance. On the other hand, the concrete block array type has templated the block type. I don't see how a getindex on the blocks would ever be performant for hierarchical matrices due to the type instability. setindex!, though is type stable.
BlockArrays has a well-developed block matrix structure, so this would avoid needing your own
Block
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: