-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
Regression, new bug, related to useMsgLikelihoods #1574
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Was first seen in |
This is the printout:
@Affie, what does the "H" mean? Looks like the way to read this line of code is that ┌ Warning: H |
So here is one inconsistency, This is good (returns
But then just lower down this, which is bad (returns
|
Ah, that's because the differential factor from the tree likelihood factor is an MKD (not Normal like user factors) which uses a different getSample function. There is some inconsistency there. |
Okay so IncrementalInference.jl/test/testUseMsgLikelihoods.jl Lines 25 to 26 in b4e9c6f
while IncrementalInference.jl/test/testUseMsgLikelihoods.jl Lines 83 to 84 in b4e9c6f
|
So fixed with forced type change of sample return for MKD case. If matrix has just one column, then convert to a vector: |
KDE returns a matrix on |
Looks like it has something to do with
getSolverParams(fg).useMsgLikelihoods = true
. MWE:Code completes fine if
useMsgLikelihoods=false
Originally posted by @dehann in #1572 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: