-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
Support 'wrong' as test data category #51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
It would be also nice to have a category for output validator checking. |
Agree that this would be nice. Do you have concrete suggestions/preferences for how to extend the problem format to include this? For input files, one could consider adding something like For output files, maybe one wants to be able to add incorrect outputs to some of the actual test cases, rather than adding new cases? If so, maybe allowing adding data files with suffix @niemela do you want to weigh in on this? |
For separation of concerns input_format_validators/bad_inputs is probably nicer. Your suggestion for output files sounds good to me. |
Hey, I implemented this feature based on your ideas. See pull request #86 for details. |
I've just implemented some version of this for BAPCtools: RagnarGrootKoerkamp/BAPCtools#35. Happy to change that to whatever structure is decided upon eventually. |
It would be nice if we could add test data to verify that the input checker fails on them but they should not be used for real judging.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: