Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature: supported symmetrics encryption for sensitive fields #92

Open
hbagdi opened this issue Nov 4, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

feature: supported symmetrics encryption for sensitive fields #92

hbagdi opened this issue Nov 4, 2019 · 4 comments
Labels
feature New feature or request status/need-feedback Something that is waiting on users to provide feedback

Comments

@hbagdi
Copy link
Member

hbagdi commented Nov 4, 2019

Fields like:

  • Certificate private key
  • Credentials for consumers
@hbagdi hbagdi added the feature New feature or request label Nov 5, 2019
@hbagdi
Copy link
Member Author

hbagdi commented Nov 9, 2019

While this is a cool feature to have, is there a real need for it?
Until there is a real demand from users, I'm going to hold off on developing this feature.

@hbagdi hbagdi added priority/low awaiting feedback Something that is waiting on users to provide feedback labels Nov 9, 2019
@leolb-aphp
Copy link

I would really appreciate such a feature, looking to solve this problem right now!

@leolb-aphp
Copy link

I'm looking at creating some ad-hoc script to encrypt/decrypt sensitive fields on the fly through stdin and stdout, my CI hosts have swap disabled so that'll be okay.

I don't know Golang so obviously it would be easier if it was implemented in decK.

The idea is that I execute decK like this:

$ ./decrypt kong.yaml | deck diff -s /dev/stdin
$ deck dump -o /dev/stdout | ./encrypt kong.yaml

@hbagdi hbagdi added status/need-feedback Something that is waiting on users to provide feedback and removed awaiting feedback Something that is waiting on users to provide feedback labels Jul 14, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 20, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale Will be closed unless advocated for within 7 days label Mar 20, 2021
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Mar 27, 2021
@hbagdi hbagdi reopened this Mar 29, 2021
@stale stale bot removed the stale Will be closed unless advocated for within 7 days label Mar 29, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request status/need-feedback Something that is waiting on users to provide feedback
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants