[Bug] Select2 in repeatable is lazy loading

[Rian190]

Bug report

What I did

I added a select2 in a repeatable.
And I activated the Model::preventLazyLoading() in the AppServiceProvider

   CRUD::addField([
            'type' => 'repeatable',
            'label' => 'Primary',
            'name' => 'Main',
            'subfields' => [
                [
                    'type' => 'select2',
                    'name' => 'relation',
                    'entity' => 'relation'
                ]
            ]
        ]);

What I expected to happen

The view should load as expected.

What happened

The Illuminate\ Database\ LazyLoadingViolationException exception is thrown

What I've already tried to fix it

??

Backpack, Laravel, PHP, DB version

When I run php artisan backpack:version the output is:

PHP VERSION:

PHP 8.2.11 (cli) (built: Oct 6 2023 09:47:18) (NTS)
Copyright (c) The PHP Group
Zend Engine v4.2.11, Copyright (c) Zend Technologies
with Zend OPcache v8.2.11, Copyright (c), by Zend Technologies
with Xdebug v3.2.1, Copyright (c) 2002-2023, by Derick Rethans

LARAVEL VERSION:

10.33.0.0

BACKPACK PACKAGE VERSIONS:

backpack/basset: 1.2.2
backpack/crud: 6.3.2
backpack/filemanager: 3.0.6
backpack/generators: v4.0.2
backpack/logmanager: v5.0.1
backpack/permissionmanager: 7.1.1
backpack/pro: 2.0.18
backpack/revise-operation: 2.0.0
backpack/settings: 3.1.0
backpack/theme-coreuiv2: 1.2.2

[phpfour]

Hi @Rian190

I have tried to reproduce the issue using our backpack demo but did not encounter it. Here's what I tried:

1. Called Model::preventLazyLoading() in the AppServiceProvider:

2. Added a repeatable field in the App\Http\Controllers\Admin\DummyCrudController and commented out everything below it:

3. Opened up the dummy create form and found it to be working:

Please let us know how we can help you debug this further.

Thanks!

[pxpm]

Wasn't able to reproduce it too. The lazy load exception must had come from some other place.

Let us know if you are still experiencing issues 🙏

[Rian190]

The project I encountered this on has been discontinued and I don't have access to the code anymore.
Thanks for checking