You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Now that we have flexible hierarchy levels, migrating between those would be nice. I actually already have an instance where this would be needed.
Migrating to less levels: Here we can create a temporary sector / area and move all lines and topo images there before skipping the hierarchy level (needs #439). Then the admin needs to manually move the lines and topo images to their actual destination.
Migrating to more levels: Here we can straight away use the placeholder areas & sectors. Then move the stuff with the feature coming in #439.
I think this is a decent idea, but it feels like there are many scenarios to consider. We should create a structured overview beforehand, so we do not end up with a solution fixing only half of the cases.
If manual operations are involved, we need some batched move operations, since no one wants to move hundreds of lines by hand :D
dorthrithil
changed the title
Hierarchy level migration migration
Hierarchy level migration
Feb 13, 2025
Now that we have flexible hierarchy levels, migrating between those would be nice. I actually already have an instance where this would be needed.
Migrating to less levels: Here we can create a temporary sector / area and move all lines and topo images there before skipping the hierarchy level (needs #439). Then the admin needs to manually move the lines and topo images to their actual destination.
Migrating to more levels: Here we can straight away use the placeholder areas & sectors. Then move the stuff with the feature coming in #439.
Blocked by #439
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: