-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
Consider using modules instead of include! #33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
The issue with using modules is that you would be running tests for all koans from the beginning. |
The |
I could give that a go, I'll check it out later. |
See rust-lang/rust-analyzer#4177.
Just like C headers,
include!
can be problematic for IDEs because there's no way to offer a good experience in the presence of code like this.I don't know if it works with full project, but an alternative is to produce something like:
instead of
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: