Skip to content

tool function: metastep or not #3

@MireilleBF

Description

@MireilleBF

The call to ravel() in the student1 notebook is categorized differently depending on the context. However, this operation is primarily utilitarian.

Should we treat it separately or not?

It appears several times in the notebooks. We can see that it is
(1) bad practice when applied multiple times to the same example
(2) used for different purposes.

Un autre exemple avec MAX où il dit other tout le temps et une fois où il est contaminé par un print voir question dédiée.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    questionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions