You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A small UX improvement would be to open the release file using the editor of choice. We could have a simple config file in the user's home folder which stores the command to run to open the file, and call that when creating the release file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Someone messaged me the other day and said that the tool didn't open an editor for them. They weren't using VSCode, they were using Cursor. So this is definitely still a problem.
We could support a config file, but I am not sure how many people would know about it. We could inform them about it as soon as the tool doesn't detect an editor. By then it would be a bit too late, they'd have to add the config file for next time, but that is definitely an option.
Alternatively, we could have the tool check for alternate editors — and do so by first checking for an executable, then a macOS app. We already check for the existence of codehere but we could check for /Applications/Visual Studio Code.app/Contents/Resources/app/bin/code instead, and do a similar thing for Cursor. This way if the user has not installed the code executable it will continue to work.
mcmire
changed the title
Automatically open release file using editor of choice
Release file doesn't always open automatically
Nov 20, 2024
A small UX improvement would be to open the release file using the editor of choice. We could have a simple config file in the user's home folder which stores the command to run to open the file, and call that when creating the release file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: