-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
Description
Hi dRep team,
I’m encountering a possible issue with how dRep assigns secondary clusters even when pairwise ANI and alignment fraction (AF) values are high.
Here’s an example from my dataset:
SPAdes-CONCOCTRefined-1UOYPL_HR.28.fa,SPAdes-CONCOCTRefined-9TDUTH_S296.109.fa,0.964682,0.3767441860465116,13
SPAdes-CONCOCTRefined-9TDUTH_S296.109.fa,SPAdes-CONCOCTRefined-1UOYPL_HR.28.fa,0.969092,0.6694214876033058,13
Comparison Direction ANI (%) Coverage (%) Primary Cluster
1UOYPL_HR.28 → 9TDUTH_S296.109 96.47% 37.67% 13
9TDUTH_S296.109 → 1UOYPL_HR.28 96.91% 66.94% 13
These two genomes belong to the same primary cluster (13) and are connected with:
Despite this, dRep splits them into different secondary clusters (13_1 and 13_2),
Field 1UOYPL_HR.28 9TDUTH_S296.109
primary_cluster 13 13
secondary_cluster 13_1 13_2
centrality 0.05 0.05
ANI and Coverage pass (≥ 95%, ≥ 0.30) pass (≥ 95%, ≥ 0.30)
Is there a reason dRep's secondary clustering would behave this way even when the ANI/AF thresholds are satisfied?
Thanks for the great tool, and I’d really appreciate clarification!