Skip to content

New Split Criteria Seem to Outperform Existing Criteria in Some Simulations #2

@morgsmss7

Description

@morgsmss7

My plan for the semester will consist of 3 main tasks:

  1. PR existing split criteria comparison into scikit-learn
  2. Clean up axis and oblique projection split criteria from last semester.
  • Write more tests (random state, memory efficiency, shared weights)
  • Implement shared weights (existing code for this exists, but I abandoned it last semester because I was getting errors which turned out to be unrelated. I would simply like to revert to this version, fix what ended up being the error after all, and make sure it works)
  1. Write a conference paper about these new splitters and how they compare against existing splitters in different simulations.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions