diff --git a/base_tier_validation/models/tier_review.py b/base_tier_validation/models/tier_review.py
index fa277921fd..ef64f2b029 100644
--- a/base_tier_validation/models/tier_review.py
+++ b/base_tier_validation/models/tier_review.py
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 class TierReview(models.Model):
     _name = "tier.review"
     _description = "Tier Review"
+    _order = "sequence, id"
 
     name = fields.Char(related="definition_id.name")
     status = fields.Selection(
@@ -93,6 +94,14 @@ def _compute_reviewed_formated_date(self):
 
     @api.depends("definition_id.approve_sequence")
     def _compute_can_review(self):
+        """Update review status. Called manually from various review operations.
+
+        To defer recompute, use context key
+        `tier_validation_defer_compute_can_review`. Be sure to explicitely call
+        the method afterwards.
+        """
+        if self.env.context.get("tier_validation_defer_compute_can_review"):
+            return
         reviews = self.filtered(lambda rev: rev.status in ["waiting", "pending"])
         if reviews:
             # get minimum sequence of all to prevent jumps
diff --git a/base_tier_validation/static/src/components/tier_review_widget/tier_review_widget.xml b/base_tier_validation/static/src/components/tier_review_widget/tier_review_widget.xml
index 7716141f1b..99582e540e 100644
--- a/base_tier_validation/static/src/components/tier_review_widget/tier_review_widget.xml
+++ b/base_tier_validation/static/src/components/tier_review_widget/tier_review_widget.xml
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
                                 <t
                                     t-foreach="_getReviewData()"
                                     t-as="review"
-                                    t-key="review.sequence"
+                                    t-key="review.id"
                                 >
                                     <t
                                         t-if="review.status == 'waiting'"
diff --git a/base_tier_validation_forward/models/tier_review.py b/base_tier_validation_forward/models/tier_review.py
index 0e0fbaffc7..2455cfe0af 100644
--- a/base_tier_validation_forward/models/tier_review.py
+++ b/base_tier_validation_forward/models/tier_review.py
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
 
 class TierReview(models.Model):
     _inherit = "tier.review"
-    _order = "sequence"
 
     # NOTE: Added translate=True because in the compute method we assign:
     #   rec.name = rec.definition_id.name
diff --git a/base_tier_validation_forward/tests/test_tier_validation.py b/base_tier_validation_forward/tests/test_tier_validation.py
index ef39bdbd0e..811591874e 100644
--- a/base_tier_validation_forward/tests/test_tier_validation.py
+++ b/base_tier_validation_forward/tests/test_tier_validation.py
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 # Copyright 2018 ForgeFlow S.L.
 # License LGPL-3.0 or later (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html).
 
-from odoo.tests import Form, tagged
+from odoo.tests import Form, new_test_user, tagged
 
 from odoo.addons.base_tier_validation.tests.common import CommonTierValidation
 
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ class TierTierValidation(CommonTierValidation):
     @classmethod
     def setUpClass(cls):
         super().setUpClass()
+        cls.other_test_user = new_test_user(cls.env, name="Clarissa", login="forward")
 
     def test_01_forward_tier(self):
         # Create new test record
@@ -65,3 +66,143 @@ def test_01_forward_tier(self):
         wiz = wizard.save()
         wiz.add_comment()
         self.assertEqual(record.validation_status, "validated")
+
+    def _test_forward_tier_multiple(self, has_comment=False):
+        """Run forwarding flow with or without comments"""
+        self.tier_def_obj.create(
+            {
+                "approve_sequence": True,
+                "definition_domain": "[('test_field', '>', 1.0)]",
+                "has_comment": has_comment,
+                "has_forward": True,
+                "model_id": self.tester_model.id,
+                "review_type": "individual",
+                "reviewer_id": self.test_user_1.id,
+                "sequence": 2,
+            }
+        )
+        self.tier_def_obj.create(
+            {
+                "approve_sequence": True,
+                "definition_domain": "[('test_field', '>', 1.0)]",
+                "has_comment": True,
+                "has_forward": True,
+                "model_id": self.tester_model.id,
+                "review_type": "individual",
+                "reviewer_id": self.test_user_2.id,
+                "sequence": 1,
+            }
+        )
+        # Create new test record
+        test_record = self.test_model.create({"test_field": 2.5})
+        test_record.with_user(self.test_user_2.id).request_validation()
+        self.env.invalidate_all()
+        self.assertRecordValues(
+            test_record.review_ids,
+            [
+                {
+                    "reviewer_id": self.test_user_1.id,
+                    "status": "pending",
+                },
+                {
+                    "reviewer_id": self.test_user_2.id,
+                    "status": "waiting",
+                },
+            ],
+        )
+        # Forward the first review
+        action = test_record.with_user(self.test_user_1).forward_tier()
+        self.env[action["res_model"]].with_user(self.test_user_1).with_context(
+            **action["context"]
+        ).create(
+            {
+                "forward_reviewer_id": self.other_test_user.id,
+                "forward_description": "Have a look",
+            }
+        ).add_forward()
+        # The forwarded review is now in status 'forwarded',
+        # The new review is in state 'pending',
+        # and the remaining review is in status 'waiting'.
+        self.assertRecordValues(
+            test_record.review_ids,
+            [
+                {
+                    "reviewer_id": self.test_user_1.id,
+                    "status": "forwarded",
+                },
+                {
+                    "reviewer_id": self.other_test_user.id,
+                    "status": "pending",
+                },
+                {
+                    "reviewer_id": self.test_user_2.id,
+                    "status": "waiting",
+                },
+            ],
+        )
+
+        action = test_record.with_user(self.other_test_user).validate_tier()
+        if action:
+            self.env[action["res_model"]].with_user(self.other_test_user).with_context(
+                **action["context"]
+            ).create(
+                {
+                    "comment": "Reviewed",
+                }
+            ).add_comment()
+
+        self.assertRecordValues(
+            test_record.review_ids,
+            [
+                {
+                    "reviewer_id": self.test_user_1.id,
+                    "status": "forwarded",
+                },
+                {
+                    "reviewer_id": self.other_test_user.id,
+                    "status": "approved",
+                },
+                {
+                    "reviewer_id": self.test_user_2.id,
+                    "status": "pending",
+                },
+            ],
+        )
+
+        action = test_record.with_user(self.test_user_2).validate_tier()
+        if action:
+            self.env[action["res_model"]].with_user(self.test_user_2).with_context(
+                **action["context"]
+            ).create(
+                {
+                    "comment": "Reviewed",
+                }
+            ).add_comment()
+
+        self.assertRecordValues(
+            test_record.review_ids,
+            [
+                {
+                    "reviewer_id": self.test_user_1.id,
+                    "status": "forwarded",
+                },
+                {
+                    "reviewer_id": self.other_test_user.id,
+                    "status": "approved",
+                },
+                {
+                    "reviewer_id": self.test_user_2.id,
+                    "status": "approved",
+                },
+            ],
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(test_record.validation_status, "validated")
+
+    def test_02_forward_tier_multiple_with_comment(self):
+        """Expected flow with forwards and comments"""
+        # Create tier definitions with a different sequence
+        self._test_forward_tier_multiple(has_comment=True)
+
+    def test_03_forward_tier_multiple_without_comment(self):
+        """Expected flow with forwards, but without comments"""
+        self._test_forward_tier_multiple(has_comment=False)
diff --git a/base_tier_validation_forward/wizard/forward_wizard.py b/base_tier_validation_forward/wizard/forward_wizard.py
index 120aa06fe8..17fe798b24 100644
--- a/base_tier_validation_forward/wizard/forward_wizard.py
+++ b/base_tier_validation_forward/wizard/forward_wizard.py
@@ -35,14 +35,20 @@ def add_forward(self):
                 )
             }
         )
-        prev_reviews = prev_comment.add_comment()
-        review = self.env["tier.review"].create(
-            {
-                "model": rec._name,
-                "res_id": rec.id,
-                "sequence": max(prev_reviews.mapped("sequence")) + 0.1,
-                "requested_by": self.env.uid,
-            }
+        prev_reviews = prev_comment.with_context(
+            tier_validation_defer_compute_can_review=True
+        ).add_comment()
+        review = (
+            self.env["tier.review"]
+            .with_context(tier_validation_defer_compute_can_review=True)
+            .create(
+                {
+                    "model": rec._name,
+                    "res_id": rec.id,
+                    "sequence": max(prev_reviews.mapped("sequence")),
+                    "requested_by": self.env.uid,
+                }
+            )
         )
         # Because following fields are readonly, we need to write after create
         review.write(