Request: "Install only for me" option during installation process

[bkidwell]

See #136 . "Install only for me" or "Autostart at login only for me" would be very useful in multi-user environments where you don't want to surprise all the other users on the system.

[bkidwell]

Workaround: Extract the contents of the installer and do a copy-paste install to your preferred folder. Run "StartMenu.exe", edit and save settings. By default it will now automatically start for only the user that executed it.

[XenHat]

That should be relatively easy to implement. I don't really have time at the moment but we accept pull requests

[Moopere]

There are settings for this inside Classic Shell already. I think its called "Auto start for this user" or somesuch.

When you install CS or OS, just ensure that this setting is turned off.

I usually just capture the whole registry key(s) pertaining to CS and roll that out with preferred settings for all users. Those that want CS can individually turn it on themselves.

[bkidwell]

"Install only for me" is a common option for desktop customization software like this. I want to be sure when I install it on a SHARED server that I affect no one else but me -- no writing to Program Files and no writing to the global Start Menu.

[Ibuprophen]

This feature request is definitely a pending item as I would like to also have this option implemented.

Please be patient regarding this feature. It's one of the top items on the "to-do" list (at the moment).

As @XenHat had previously stated...

For ANYONE who (of course, versed with Pull Requests on Github) has any ideas, suggestions, etc...

We are more than happy to provide ANY Pull Requests regarding fixes, enhancements, features, etc... and, of course, if it works, it will be merged.

Thank you very much for your time, patience, understanding and especially your support for this software! 👌

~Ibuprophen

[bkidwell]

Yes @ibuprophen1 , I agree that it is important and non-critical -- especially since my stated workaround is good. I didn't mean to imply any demand when I was replying to @Moopere .

[Ibuprophen]

No Worries! 🎉

I do encourage the occasional feedback to all issues reported here.

When i see issues that have no member feedback, contributions, status updates, etc... for a long time (approx 60+ days), it makes me think that the original OP member who reported the issue has either resolved it (in one fashion or another) OR may have no interest at all in the issue OR something else.

I'm doing what I can to help the developmental team out with scrubbing through all these open issues (primarily the older ones) and apply the appropriate action as necessary (Closing, Tagging, etc..).

I had planned to create a Pinned List of the various "to-do's" here so those of you can see what's done and not done but, more on this will be seen as soon as I can get a handle on the reported issues as explained above.

WE REALLY appreciate everyone's patience and THANK YOU!!!! 🎂 🙃

~Ibuprophen