Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New format??? #381

Closed
charlie-sans opened this issue Mar 1, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

New format??? #381

charlie-sans opened this issue Mar 1, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@charlie-sans
Copy link

hey.
I am in the process of making a new file format
it's going to be ether .VR or .VIRT
it will be built on the already existing version 5 format of the NBS files
so there can be backward compatibility between my program and this one.

this is only a suggestion for the 4.0 update so you can take this as you will.

I have a python demo of the format for people to try so they can see how it works.

if you want I can comment with a GitHub repo containing the new format maker.

this format is licenced under the MIT licence, allowing it to be open source.
I hope I can make it an open source of not then let me know!

@charlie-sans
Copy link
Author

now i do want to let you know that this format will go thru heavy and extensive changes

@koca2000
Copy link

koca2000 commented Mar 1, 2023

There was a discussion about the future of the .nbs format in #307.

@charlie-sans
Copy link
Author

how about we introduce the new stuff in #307 into this format with some other things

in the support channel in the discord. I have put an HTML file containing the new format for version 6-beta-1

obviously ill add the stuff in the #307 issue to this new format but for now, I can't make it as I can't understand the Pynbs thingie. so ill need to get help from the ben and val.

@charlie-sans
Copy link
Author

I have the base for it ready and can make the files and read/write to them. the problem is that I don't really know how Pynbs works. i did the things but it seams to be broken at the moment.

@Bentroen
Copy link
Member

Hi! The new format you proposed is really interesting; however, since it's out of the scope for this project, I will be closing this issue for the moment. Feel free to suggest improvements to the existing format in #307, which is where we're tracking future additions to the current standard!

@Bentroen Bentroen closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Apr 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants