Add GitBulter workflow documentation to CLAUDE.md

[Kyle-Ye]

Summary

• Added comprehensive GitBulter workflow rules to CLAUDE.md
• Documented critical Git and GitHub workflow requirements for Claude Code

Changes

• Added new "Git and GitHub Workflow" section to CLAUDE.md
• Documented rules for:
  • Never changing branches (managed by GitBulter)
  • Committing to specific branches without HEAD changes
  • Creating PRs with gh using exact branch specifications
  • Proper commit and PR workflows

Why this is important

GitBulter manages branches differently than standard Git workflows. These documentation updates ensure Claude Code respects the GitBulter workflow and doesn't interfere with branch management.

Test plan

• CLAUDE.md properly documents all GitBulter requirements
• Rules are clear and enforceable
• Documentation follows existing project style

[claude]

Code Review Feedback

Thank you for this well-structured PR! I've reviewed the changes and here's my feedback:

✅ Positive Aspects

Documentation Quality: The GitBulter workflow documentation is comprehensive and clearly structured. The critical Git rules section effectively communicates the importance of respecting GitBulter's branch management.

Consistency: The URL updates from Apple Developer docs to OpenSwiftUI Project docs are consistent and appropriate for an open-source implementation. All references have been properly updated to point to the project's own documentation.

Code Style Compliance: Changes follow the project's style guidelines - minimal modifications, proper formatting, and adherence to existing patterns.

📝 Minor Observations

Mixed Change Types: The PR combines documentation updates (CLAUDE.md) with URL reference updates across Swift files. While both are valuable, they serve different purposes - consider separating such changes in future PRs for clearer change tracking.

Documentation Links: The updated URLs point to Swift Package Index documentation which should remain stable, but consider adding fallback references to ensure long-term accessibility.

🔍 Technical Assessment

• No bugs or security concerns identified
• No performance impact - changes are documentation-only
• No test coverage issues - documentation and comment changes don't require tests
• API compatibility maintained - only documentation links changed, no functional modifications

✅ Overall Assessment

This is a clean, well-executed PR that improves project documentation and maintains consistency with OpenSwiftUI's ecosystem. The GitBulter workflow rules will be particularly helpful for Claude Code integration.

Recommendation: Approve and merge 👍

[claude]

📋 Pull Request Review

Overall Assessment: ✅ Excellent addition

This PR adds crucial GitBulter workflow documentation that will prevent common Git workflow conflicts between Claude Code and GitBulter. The documentation is well-structured and addresses real operational needs.

✅ Code Quality & Best Practices

• Clear structure: The new section follows existing CLAUDE.md organization patterns
• Consistent formatting: Proper markdown usage with code blocks and emphasis
• Comprehensive coverage: Addresses both commit and PR workflows
• Actionable guidance: Provides specific commands and examples

✅ Documentation Accuracy

• Verified build scripts: Referenced ./Scripts/build.sh and ./Scripts/build_swiftinterface.sh exist
• Consistent with existing style guidelines: References to .github/copilot-instructions.md are accurate
• Proper GitHub CLI usage: gh pr create commands are correctly documented

✅ No Issues Found

• No bugs: This is documentation-only, no executable code to break
• No performance impact: Documentation changes don't affect runtime performance
• No security concerns: No sensitive information exposed, workflow improves security by preventing unauthorized branch changes
• Test coverage N/A: Documentation changes don't require test coverage

🎯 Specific Strengths

1. Critical workflow protection: Prevents Claude from interfering with GitBulter's branch management
2. Clear examples: The commit message example template is helpful and realistic
3. Step-by-step processes: Both commit and PR workflows are broken down clearly
4. Proper emphasis: Uses bold formatting to highlight critical "NEVER" rules

💡 Minor Suggestions

1. Consider adding version info: Might be helpful to note which GitBulter version these rules apply to
2. Link to GitBulter docs: Could include a reference to GitBulter documentation for users unfamiliar with the tool

🏆 Impact

This documentation will significantly improve Claude Code's integration with the project's workflow by:

• Preventing branch management conflicts
• Ensuring proper commit attribution through GitBulter
• Maintaining clean PR creation process
• Reducing user frustration from workflow mismatches

Recommendation: Approved ✅

This is a valuable addition that addresses real workflow challenges. The documentation is clear, accurate, and follows project conventions.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 24.45%. Comparing base (de5fb0b) to head (d7c39f2).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #488      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   24.44%   24.45%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         470      470              
  Lines       27214    27214              
==========================================
+ Hits         6653     6656       +3     
+ Misses      20561    20558       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.