CI: fix markdownlint #76
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MarkdownLint v0.39.0 introduced a new rule regarding table formatting. While the principle of the rule is actually quite nice, it doesn't play nice with some of the tables in the PHPCS 4.0 upgrade guides, and while those files could, of course, be updated, that wouldn't improve the maintainability of the tables. So, for now, I'm electing to ignore the new rule (`MD060`). Refs: * https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/blob/v0.39.0/CHANGELOG.md#0390 * https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/blob/main/doc/md060.md
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
MarkdownLint v0.39.0 introduced a new rule regarding table formatting.
While the principle of the rule is actually quite nice, it doesn't play nice with some of the tables in the PHPCS 4.0 upgrade guides, and while those files could, of course, be updated, that wouldn't improve the maintainability of the tables.
So, for now, I'm electing to ignore the new rule (
MD060).Refs: