You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, all non-pessimistc saga lookups are using consistent-reads. Theoretically, it would be possible to allow inconsistent reads at the cost of potentially running into more optimistic concurrency violations on contended sagas. This might be a nice cost optimization for certain scenarios.
When using pessimistic locking the record is read with an update with return results ALL therefore non-consistent reads do not apply there.
Additional Context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the suggested improvement
Currently, all non-pessimistc saga lookups are using consistent-reads. Theoretically, it would be possible to allow inconsistent reads at the cost of potentially running into more optimistic concurrency violations on contended sagas. This might be a nice cost optimization for certain scenarios.
When using pessimistic locking the record is read with an update with return results ALL therefore non-consistent reads do not apply there.
Additional Context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: