Suggest that the feature flag should be called 'list_utils'; reminiscent of the List::Util module name

Author: leonerd

ppcs/ppc0027-any-and-all.md

@@ -19,9 +19,11 @@ Most code of any appreciable size tends to make use of at least the `any` or `al
 
 ## Specification
 
-New named features that, when enabled, activate syntax analogous to the existing `grep` operator, named `any` and `all`:
+A new named feature that, when enabled, activates new operators analogous to the existing `grep` operator, named `any` and `all`:
 
 ```perl
+use feature 'list_utils';
+
 any { BLOCK } LIST
 
 all { BLOCK } LIST
@@ -50,17 +52,17 @@ Some::Class->new(
 
 ## Backwards Compatibility
 
-As these new operators are guarded by named features, there are no immediate concerns with backward compatiblity in the short-term.
+As these new operators are guarded by a named feature, there are no immediate concerns with backward compatiblity in the short-term.
 
-In the longer term, if these named features become part of a versioned feature bundle that is enabled by a corresponding `use VERSION` declaration there may be concerns that the names collide with functions provided by `List::Util` or similar modules. As the intention of these operators is to provide the same behaviour, this is not considered a major problem. Differences due to caller scope as outlined above may be surprising to a small number of users.
+In the longer term, if this named feature becomes part of a versioned feature bundle that is enabled by a corresponding `use VERSION` declaration there may be concerns that the names collide with functions provided by `List::Util` or similar modules. As the intention of these operators is to provide the same behaviour, this is not considered a major problem. Differences due to caller scope as outlined above may be surprising to a small number of users.
 
 ## Security Implications
 
 ## Examples
 
 ```perl
 use v5.40;
-use feature 'any';
+use feature 'list_utils';
 
 if( any { $_ > 10 } 5, 10, 15, 20 ) { say "A number above 10" }
 ```
@@ -114,10 +116,6 @@ In any case, as junctions behave like values, they do not require special syntax
 
 ## Open Issues
 
-* There could be anything up to five new operators added by this idea. Do they all get their own named feature flags? Do they all live under one flag?
-
-* Should the flag be called `any`? That might be confusing as compared to the `:any` import tag which would request all features.
-
 ## Copyright
 
 Copyright (C) 2024, Paul Evans.