You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current design of #148 combines the handling of rewriting from the squin.qubit and squin.wire dialects as one rewrite. @weinbe58 pointed out the double handling might not even be necessary on the basis that #25 could be implemented (then I could just handle going from squin.wire to stim) but @Roger-luo has told me if the work is already done (as it has!) then I might as well split them up (: , which I think would be good on the additional basis that there's a lot of somewhat annoying type checking going on 👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current design of #148 combines the handling of rewriting from the squin.qubit and squin.wire dialects as one rewrite. @weinbe58 pointed out the double handling might not even be necessary on the basis that #25 could be implemented (then I could just handle going from squin.wire to stim) but @Roger-luo has told me if the work is already done (as it has!) then I might as well split them up (: , which I think would be good on the additional basis that there's a lot of somewhat annoying type checking going on 👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: