You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: lectures/ge_arrow.md
+15-14Lines changed: 15 additions & 14 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ $$
145
145
146
146
for all $t$ and for all $s^t$.
147
147
148
-
## Recursive Formulation
148
+
## Recursive formulation
149
149
150
150
Following descriptions in section 9.3.3 of Ljungqvist and Sargent {cite}`Ljungqvist2012` chapter 9, we set up a competitive equilibrium of a pure exchange economy with complete markets in one-period Arrow securities.
151
151
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ are zero net aggregate claims.
239
239
240
240
241
241
242
-
## State Variable Degeneracy
242
+
## State variable degeneracy
243
243
244
244
Please see Ljungqvist and Sargent {cite}`Ljungqvist2012` for a description of
245
245
timing protocol for trades consistent with an Arrow-Debreu vision in which
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ This outcome depends critically on there being complete markets in Arrow securit
284
284
285
285
For example, it does not prevail in the incomplete markets setting of this lecture {doc}`The Aiyagari Model <aiyagari>`
286
286
287
-
## Markov Asset Prices
287
+
## Markov asset prices
288
288
289
289
290
290
Let's start with a brief summary of formulas for computing asset prices in
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ $$
315
315
316
316
* The gross rate of return on a one-period risk-free bond Markov state $\bar s_i$ is $R_i = (\sum_j Q_{i,j})^{-1}$
317
317
318
-
### Exogenous Pricing Kernel
318
+
### Exogenous pricing kernel
319
319
320
320
At this point, we'll take the pricing kernel $Q$ as exogenous, i.e., determined outside the model
321
321
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ Below, we describe an equilibrium model with trading of one-period Arrow securit
352
352
353
353
In constructing our model, we'll repeatedly encounter formulas that remind us of our asset pricing formulas.
354
354
355
-
### Multi-Step-Forward Transition Probabilities and Pricing Kernels
355
+
### Multi-step-forward transition probabilities and pricing kernels
356
356
357
357
The $(i,j)$ component of the $\ell$-step ahead transition probability $P^\ell$ is
358
358
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ $$
370
370
371
371
We'll use these objects to state a useful property in asset pricing theory.
372
372
373
-
### Laws of Iterated Expectations and Iterated Values
373
+
### Laws of iterated expectations and iterated values
374
374
375
375
A *law of iterated values* has a mathematical structure that parallels a
376
376
*law of iterated expectations*
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ V \left[ V ( d(s_{t+j}) | s_{t+1} ) | s_t \right]
432
432
\end{aligned}
433
433
$$
434
434
435
-
## General Equilibrium
435
+
## General equilibrium
436
436
437
437
Now we are ready to do some fun calculations.
438
438
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ $$
483
483
484
484
* A collection of $n \times 1$ vectors of individual $k$ consumptions: $c^k\left(s\right), k=1,\ldots, K$
485
485
486
-
### $Q$ is the Pricing Kernel
486
+
### $Q$ is the pricing kernel
487
487
488
488
489
489
For any agent $k \in \left[1, \ldots, K\right]$, at the equilibrium allocation,
@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ be nonnegative, then in a *finite horizon* economy with sequential trading of on
587
587
588
588
589
589
590
-
### Continuation Wealth
590
+
### Continuation wealth
591
591
592
592
Continuation wealth plays an important role in Bellmanizing a competitive equilibrium with sequential
593
593
trading of a complete set of one-period Arrow securities.
@@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ the economy begins with all agents being debt-free and financial-asset-free at
645
645
Note that all agents' continuation wealths recurrently return to zero when the Markov state returns to whatever value $s_0$ it had at time $0$.
646
646
```
647
647
648
-
### Optimal Portfolios
648
+
### Optimal portfolios
649
649
650
650
A nifty feature of the model is that an optimal portfolio of a type $k$ agent equals the continuation wealth that we just computed.
0 commit comments