You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Previously some draft code for modelling defects at surfaces was added to the surface-defects branch, but this was based on much older versions of doped and so has been deleted. Defect generation in doped is now sufficiently fast that we should be able to just provide a surface slab to doped, and it will efficiently enumerate all possible symmetry-inequivalent defects.
Key points:
Previously the pymatgenSlab.symmetrically_remove_atoms and Slab.symmetrically_add_atom methods were used so that defects were initialised symmetrically on both sides of the slab -- is this still desired / standard practice for surface defect studies?
In future, it would be worth adding a tutorial on defect generation for surfaces (and their charge-corrections) to the tutorials. Likely to be driven by a specific research project (let us know!).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Previously some draft code for modelling defects at surfaces was added to the
surface-defects
branch, but this was based on much older versions ofdoped
and so has been deleted. Defect generation indoped
is now sufficiently fast that we should be able to just provide a surface slab todoped
, and it will efficiently enumerate all possible symmetry-inequivalent defects.Key points:
pymatgen
Slab.symmetrically_remove_atoms
andSlab.symmetrically_add_atom
methods were used so that defects were initialised symmetrically on both sides of the slab -- is this still desired / standard practice for surface defect studies?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: