|
1 | 1 | .. _dvopmcharacterization-home: |
2 | 2 |
|
3 | | -############################### |
| 3 | +############################## |
4 | 4 | Altair DV-OPM Characterization |
5 | | -############################### |
| 5 | +############################## |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +To characterize the performance of the Altair DV-OPM, we evaluated the performance of the illumination train by imaging the sheet profile, and we also imged 1um fluorescent beads to quantify the resolution of the system. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +--------------- |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +Beam Characterization |
| 12 | +_____________________ |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +To characterize the beam profile of the illumination train, we imaged the sheet profile in air at a range of axial positions. |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +To characterize the illumination beam, we imaged the light sheet in air while translating the camera through a series of axial positions along the propagation direction, $Y'$. We then selected a fixed lateral region near the center of the sheet, so that the thickness measurement was made from the same representative part of the sheet at every axial position. |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +For each axial plane, the background-corrected intensity profile along the sheet thickness direction, $Z'$, was extracted and fit with a Gaussian function. The fitted Gaussian standard deviation, $\sigma$, was converted to FWHM using $\mathrm{FWHM}=2.35\sigma$ after applying the camera pixel size. The FWHM was subsequently converted to the Gaussian beam waist, $w$, using $w=\mathrm{FWHM}/\sqrt{2\ln2}$, where $w$ corresponds to the $1/e^2$ intensity radius. The best-focus plane was defined as the axial position with the minimum FWHM. From this plane, we measured an FWHM of $17.1~\mu\mathrm{m}$, corresponding to $w_0=14.53~\mu\mathrm{m}$. |
| 19 | +We directly measured the usable axial distance from the experimental waist curve as the range over which $w(Y') \leq \sqrt{2}w_0$, giving a usable distance of approximately $2.00~\mathrm{mm}$. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +.. figure:: Images/Axial_Thickness_Intensity.jpg |
| 22 | + :align: center |
| 23 | + :alt: Sheet profile characterization. |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | + **Figure 1:** Characterization of the light sheet profile in air along the axial direction. |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +At the best-focus plane, we also characterized the spatial distribution of the sheet. A representative image was used to show the light sheet morphology and its long lateral extent along $X'$. The normalized background-corrected intensity profile along $Z'$ reports the measured sheet thickness, while the lateral profile along $X'$ was calculated by summing the background-corrected intensity along $Z'$ at each lateral position. This provided a measure of the illumination distribution across the approximately $6.5~\mathrm{mm}$ lateral extent of the sheet. |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +.. figure:: Images/Focal_Plane.jpg |
| 30 | + :align: center |
| 31 | + :alt: Sheet profile characterization at focal plane. |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | + **Figure 2:** Characterization of the light sheet profile in air at the best-focus plane. A. Camera Image of the light sheet at the best-focus plane. B. Normalized intensity profile along the sheet thickness direction, $Z'$. C. Normalized intensity profile along the lateral direction, $X'$. |
6 | 34 |
|
7 | 35 | Beads |
8 | 36 | _____ |
9 | 37 |
|
10 | | -Placeholder |
| 38 | +To quantify the resolution of the system, we imaged 1um fluorescent beads embedded in agarose. |
11 | 39 |
|
12 | | ------------------------------- |
| 40 | +We imaged the beads at different axial positions along the propagation direction, $Y'$, and we measured the FWHM of the bead images along the lateral and axial directions to quantify the resolution of the system. |
13 | 41 |
|
14 | | -Cells |
15 | | -_____ |
| 42 | +To prepare fluorescent bead samples, we diluted 1 µm YG nanosphere at a concentration of 1:1000 with deionized water and sonicated for 3 minutes to minimize aggregation. The resulting solution was later diluted at a concentration of 1:100 with 2% low-melting agarose for volumetric imaging. |
16 | 43 |
|
17 | | -Placeholder |
| 44 | +.. figure:: Images/Beads_All.jpg |
| 45 | + :align: center |
| 46 | + :alt: Bead characterization. |
18 | 47 |
|
19 | | ------------------------------- |
| 48 | + **Figure 3:** Image of 1um fluorescent beads embedded in agarose, imaged with the Altair DV-OPM. The beads are visible as bright spots against the dark background, and their size and shape can be used to quantify the resolution of the system. |
20 | 49 |
|
21 | | -Liver |
22 | | -_____ |
| 50 | +.. figure:: Images/Beads_Single.jpg |
| 51 | + :align: center |
| 52 | + :alt: Bead characterization profiles. |
23 | 53 |
|
24 | | -Placeholder |
| 54 | + **Figure 4:** Single Zoomed-in Bead Image in XY and XZ planes. |
25 | 55 |
|
26 | | ------------------------------- |
| 56 | +We measured the full width at half-maximum (FWHM) values measured from images of 1 µm fluorescent beads (n = 302 beads), binned into 8 sections by lateral position across the field of view and the median values in each section are reported (in micrometers) for the X′, Y′ and Z′ directions. |
27 | 57 |
|
28 | | -Brain |
29 | | -_____ |
| 58 | +.. figure:: Images/Median_FWHM_final.svg |
| 59 | + :align: center |
| 60 | + :alt: Bead characterization profiles. |
30 | 61 |
|
31 | | -Placeholder |
| 62 | + **Figure 5:** Median FWHM values measured from images of 1 µm fluorescent beads, binned by lateral position across the field of view. |
32 | 63 |
|
| 64 | +------------------------------ |
0 commit comments