Skip to content

Commit 5886c03

Browse files
committed
Edits, Characterization Section
1 parent 925ef34 commit 5886c03

16 files changed

Lines changed: 828 additions & 20 deletions
190 KB
Loading
73 KB
Loading
26.8 KB
Loading
179 KB
Loading

docs/source/dvopm_characterization/Images/Median_FWHM_final.svg

Lines changed: 764 additions & 0 deletions
Loading
Lines changed: 47 additions & 15 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,32 +1,64 @@
11
.. _dvopmcharacterization-home:
22

3-
###############################
3+
##############################
44
Altair DV-OPM Characterization
5-
###############################
5+
##############################
6+
7+
To characterize the performance of the Altair DV-OPM, we evaluated the performance of the illumination train by imaging the sheet profile, and we also imged 1um fluorescent beads to quantify the resolution of the system.
8+
9+
---------------
10+
11+
Beam Characterization
12+
_____________________
13+
14+
To characterize the beam profile of the illumination train, we imaged the sheet profile in air at a range of axial positions.
15+
16+
To characterize the illumination beam, we imaged the light sheet in air while translating the camera through a series of axial positions along the propagation direction, $Y'$. We then selected a fixed lateral region near the center of the sheet, so that the thickness measurement was made from the same representative part of the sheet at every axial position.
17+
18+
For each axial plane, the background-corrected intensity profile along the sheet thickness direction, $Z'$, was extracted and fit with a Gaussian function. The fitted Gaussian standard deviation, $\sigma$, was converted to FWHM using $\mathrm{FWHM}=2.35\sigma$ after applying the camera pixel size. The FWHM was subsequently converted to the Gaussian beam waist, $w$, using $w=\mathrm{FWHM}/\sqrt{2\ln2}$, where $w$ corresponds to the $1/e^2$ intensity radius. The best-focus plane was defined as the axial position with the minimum FWHM. From this plane, we measured an FWHM of $17.1~\mu\mathrm{m}$, corresponding to $w_0=14.53~\mu\mathrm{m}$.
19+
We directly measured the usable axial distance from the experimental waist curve as the range over which $w(Y') \leq \sqrt{2}w_0$, giving a usable distance of approximately $2.00~\mathrm{mm}$.
20+
21+
.. figure:: Images/Axial_Thickness_Intensity.jpg
22+
:align: center
23+
:alt: Sheet profile characterization.
24+
25+
**Figure 1:** Characterization of the light sheet profile in air along the axial direction.
26+
27+
At the best-focus plane, we also characterized the spatial distribution of the sheet. A representative image was used to show the light sheet morphology and its long lateral extent along $X'$. The normalized background-corrected intensity profile along $Z'$ reports the measured sheet thickness, while the lateral profile along $X'$ was calculated by summing the background-corrected intensity along $Z'$ at each lateral position. This provided a measure of the illumination distribution across the approximately $6.5~\mathrm{mm}$ lateral extent of the sheet.
28+
29+
.. figure:: Images/Focal_Plane.jpg
30+
:align: center
31+
:alt: Sheet profile characterization at focal plane.
32+
33+
**Figure 2:** Characterization of the light sheet profile in air at the best-focus plane. A. Camera Image of the light sheet at the best-focus plane. B. Normalized intensity profile along the sheet thickness direction, $Z'$. C. Normalized intensity profile along the lateral direction, $X'$.
634

735
Beads
836
_____
937

10-
Placeholder
38+
To quantify the resolution of the system, we imaged 1um fluorescent beads embedded in agarose.
1139

12-
------------------------------
40+
We imaged the beads at different axial positions along the propagation direction, $Y'$, and we measured the FWHM of the bead images along the lateral and axial directions to quantify the resolution of the system.
1341

14-
Cells
15-
_____
42+
To prepare fluorescent bead samples, we diluted 1 µm YG nanosphere at a concentration of 1:1000 with deionized water and sonicated for 3 minutes to minimize aggregation. The resulting solution was later diluted at a concentration of 1:100 with 2% low-melting agarose for volumetric imaging.
1643

17-
Placeholder
44+
.. figure:: Images/Beads_All.jpg
45+
:align: center
46+
:alt: Bead characterization.
1847

19-
------------------------------
48+
**Figure 3:** Image of 1um fluorescent beads embedded in agarose, imaged with the Altair DV-OPM. The beads are visible as bright spots against the dark background, and their size and shape can be used to quantify the resolution of the system.
2049

21-
Liver
22-
_____
50+
.. figure:: Images/Beads_Single.jpg
51+
:align: center
52+
:alt: Bead characterization profiles.
2353

24-
Placeholder
54+
**Figure 4:** Single Zoomed-in Bead Image in XY and XZ planes.
2555

26-
------------------------------
56+
We measured the full width at half-maximum (FWHM) values measured from images of 1 µm fluorescent beads (n = 302 beads), binned into 8 sections by lateral position across the field of view and the median values in each section are reported (in micrometers) for the X′, Y′ and Z′ directions.
2757

28-
Brain
29-
_____
58+
.. figure:: Images/Median_FWHM_final.svg
59+
:align: center
60+
:alt: Bead characterization profiles.
3061

31-
Placeholder
62+
**Figure 5:** Median FWHM values measured from images of 1 µm fluorescent beads, binned by lateral position across the field of view.
3263

64+
------------------------------
104 KB
Loading
47 KB
Loading
72.8 KB
Loading
77 KB
Loading

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)