Validation checklist for agent configuration and route changes #1209
allrouter369-droid
started this conversation in
Show and tell
Replies: 3 comments
|
@allrouter369-droid Show and tell is fine, theres no current rules for it. |
0 replies
|
Thanks. The main thing we need is a quick review of the reproducible test protocol. If it looks appropriate, an optional pointer to 3-5 volunteers who already use Agnix with OpenAI-compatible endpoints would help, but it is not required. We will not ask for credentials or endorsement. The pilot records only redacted route configuration, HTTP status, returned model, token usage, latency, and whether one low-risk task completed successfully. Results will be published here as an anonymized pass/fail matrix. No signup link is needed in this discussion. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I'm testing a compact validation checklist for users who change an AI coding agent's provider or route. It covers the agent instructions, one low-risk task, first-call success, and a small set of usage evidence. The goal is to make the setup auditable rather than to promote a provider.
The pilot would involve at most 5 volunteers and no API keys, private code, or signup link in the initial discussion. Would this be appropriate for Show and tell, or is there another category or maintainer I should contact?
All reactions