You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This can be useful to simulate more complex (and "realistic") interactions between oscillators. It is also used in the original paper(s) when testing the model.
The fundamental frequency can still be set as is. But my idea is that the user can choose to offset/distribute the frequencies of the ksync node, through object arguments, based on various statistical distributions/models. In the paper, the Cauchy–Lorentz distribution is used for some experiments. A simple bell curve could also be an option.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
aleksati
changed the title
[aleks.ksync] - add option to vary/distribute the fundametal frequencies of each ksync node.
[aleks.ksync] - add option to vary/distribute the fundametal frequencies of the ksync nodes
Dec 4, 2022
aleksati
changed the title
[aleks.ksync] - add option to vary/distribute the fundametal frequencies of the ksync nodes
[aleks.ksync] - add option to systematically offset/distribute the fundamental frequencies of the ksync nodes
Dec 4, 2022
This can be useful to simulate more complex (and "realistic") interactions between oscillators. It is also used in the original paper(s) when testing the model.
The fundamental frequency can still be set as is. But my idea is that the user can choose to offset/distribute the frequencies of the ksync node, through object arguments, based on various statistical distributions/models. In the paper, the Cauchy–Lorentz distribution is used for some experiments. A simple bell curve could also be an option.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: