fix: cargo audit warning for rustls-pemfile #565
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustls-pemfile is now unamintained: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0134.html This commit updates the deps according to the advisory to use rustls-pki-types directly rather than rustls-pemfile. Closes apache#564
Contributor
|
Thanks @crepererum and @mgattozzi |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #564
Rationale for this change
rustls-pemfile is now unamintained: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0134.html
While cargo-audit is setup in this repo to allow the warning, we deny on our CI and would like to update the dep for a point release sometime in the future.
What changes are included in this PR?
This commit updates the deps according to the advisory to use rustls-pki-types directly rather than rustls-pemfile.
Are there any user-facing changes?
There should be no user facing changes.