Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Pure rustls dependency mode as a option, let OpenSSL be optional. #6572

Closed
ghost opened this issue Feb 13, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Stale

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 13, 2023

🚀 Feature Request

Try to clean up OpenSSL dependency for avoid OpenSSL for additional step about OpenSSL manual compiling.

Motivation

Try to get rid of openssl-sys manual compiling for smooth experience on compiling.
Imporve cross compiling experience.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Pitch

Describe the solution you'd like

I think I would later open the PR by myself for process this stuff, currently looks like isahc are stucking on rustls support.
sagebind/isahc#199

Describe alternatives you've considered

What alternatives?

Are you willing to open a pull request? (See CONTRIBUTING)
Yes.

Additional context

@ghost ghost added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 13, 2023
@ghost ghost changed the title [Feature Request] Pure rustls dependency mode only as option, let OpenSSL be optional. [Feature Request] Pure rustls dependency mode as a option, let OpenSSL be optional. Feb 13, 2023
@gregnazario
Copy link
Contributor

I agree, openssl is a real pain sometimes. I've thought about either including OpenSSL statically in the binaries, which would be another option

@gregnazario
Copy link
Contributor

Let me know if you are able to update the dependency, but this is low priority for now

@gregnazario gregnazario moved this from 🎉 New to ⏳ Backlog in Developer Experience Mar 17, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 2, 2023

This issue is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove the stale label or comment - otherwise this will be closed in 15 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label May 2, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 17, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from ⏳ Backlog to ✅ Done in Developer Experience May 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Stale
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant