-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 272
Support skim as an alternative to fzf #879
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I created a shim function [1] to call skim instead of fzf in vim. It should 'just work'. The PR hasent been merged thou. |
Looks interesting how short that patch is, I don't get how it works though. I know |
No, it doesnt. Thats what the patch adds, and it just reuses the arguments with edit: obviously it wouldnt work well if fzf-vim is also present. |
Copied from skim-rs#7, but moved to the requested file. I'm doing it since the author of skim-rs#7 seems to have deleted thier account. Hoping to close autozimu/LanguageClient-neovim#879
Looks like I was already using skim before that since fzf stuff are already present even though I didn't install it, most likely because skim is a drop-in replace for fzf, it didn't even change the naming and the plugin still call it fzf. |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Skim is a fuzzy finder similar to fzf. It can be integrated to Vim using the Skim.vim plugin. It would be nice to make Vista.vim compliant with skim to not have to install fzf in addition.
By the way, skim is also written in rust, related PR solved in liuchengxu/vista.vim#129
Describe the solution you'd like
skim is an alternative to FZF, and skim.vim and fzf.vim does not differs much from the look.
Describe alternatives you've considered
skim.vim is the alternative to fzf.vim
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: