You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I get lost in this layout, because in my head, the symbols are on a number line: -n -+ -/+ =+ = += +/- +- +n, so my mouse instinct scrolls toward the top of the menu for +- but finds =.
I consulted the NAG chart, and I see that you're following that scheme, so I can't use that to support me. But do you agree that if we placed the evaluation symbols over a line representing computer evaluations of a position, it would look like -+ -/+ =+ = += +/- +- .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The position evaluation symbols are laid out:
=
+=
=+
+/-
-/+
+-
-+
I get lost in this layout, because in my head, the symbols are on a number line: -n -+ -/+ =+ = += +/- +- +n, so my mouse instinct scrolls toward the top of the menu for +- but finds =.
I consulted the NAG chart, and I see that you're following that scheme, so I can't use that to support me. But do you agree that if we placed the evaluation symbols over a line representing computer evaluations of a position, it would look like -+ -/+ =+ = += +/- +- .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: