Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Single-Fold Evaluator #41

Closed
michelole opened this issue Apr 6, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Single-Fold Evaluator #41

michelole opened this issue Apr 6, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
@michelole
Labels
P1 Higher priority issues, a SHOULD

Comments

@michelole
Copy link
Member

We might not be able to cross-validate (#12) with neural nets (#10).

Therefore, consider methods for single fold evaluation.
@michelole michelole added the P1 Higher priority issues, a SHOULD label Apr 6, 2018
@michelole
Copy link
Member Author

Could be used for #33 as well.

@michelole michelole mentioned this issue Apr 10, 2018
Closed
@michelole michelole assigned michelole and unassigned michelole Apr 10, 2018
@michelole
Copy link
Member Author

Placeholder code was added at c937fb2.

@michelole michelole self-assigned this Apr 19, 2018
michelole added a commit to michelole/n2c2 that referenced this issue Apr 20, 2018
@michelole
Improve DatasetUtil and add tests
6dd937c 
For single-fold evaluation (bst-mug#41), we need to be able to slice a list of patients by a given array of randomly selected indices. Therefore, add a getRandomIndices method to get a (deterministic) list of pseudo-random integers. Also, allow slice to be operated on a longer list, but restricted by initial index and length.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@michelole michelole

Labels
P1 Higher priority issues, a SHOULD
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@michelole