Bzip2: Possible oversight?

[jspark311]

Hi there,

I'm not sure if it was an oversight or not, but the documentation is misleading. I cannot use Bzip2 to compress anything but a stream. I forked your repo and did the needful. Should I submit a PR, or was the omission intentional?

[cscott]

PRs are always helpful, if nothing else than to clarify what you're talking about.

[dkg]

take a look at #20 please, i think it might address this concern. @jspark311, can you verify?

[jspark311]

No. My issue was an API asymmetry.
https://github.com/cscott/compressjs/blob/master/lib/Bzip2.js#L879

I made local changes to the package, but never submitted them. Since cryptjs was not operable at the time, browser-based compression was not on my priority list.

I followed the thread "compressjs dependency #695", but my issue wasn't related to what those guys are talking about, and your change doesn't address the gap this issue is related to.

I needed "compressBlock" as well as "decompressBlock".