You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, everyone. Since DeepTB (the 1st version) is compatible with SOC cases, I'm a bit curious about the compatibility of DeePTB-E3 (the 2nd version) with SOC scenarios. As in the DeepTB-E3 paper, the benchmarking datasets are all for the noSOC scenario. On the other hand, DeepTB-E3 is based on the SO(2) operation. Theoretically speaking, SO(2) may be a bit tricky regarding numerical stability, even compared to O(3) CGTB, especially when the irrep parities are more complicated when SOC is involved. Has DeepHTB-E3 been tested for SOC scenarios, and is it compatible?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi, everyone. Since DeepTB (the 1st version) is compatible with SOC cases, I'm a bit curious about the compatibility of DeePTB-E3 (the 2nd version) with SOC scenarios. As in the DeepTB-E3 paper, the benchmarking datasets are all for the noSOC scenario. On the other hand, DeepTB-E3 is based on the SO(2) operation. Theoretically speaking, SO(2) may be a bit tricky regarding numerical stability, even compared to O(3) CGTB, especially when the irrep parities are more complicated when SOC is involved. Has DeepHTB-E3 been tested for SOC scenarios, and is it compatible?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions