Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Speed issues: applying the NUFFT #2

Open
dgallichan opened this issue Sep 2, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Speed issues: applying the NUFFT #2

dgallichan opened this issue Sep 2, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@dgallichan
Copy link
Owner

I have adapted the NUFFT from (Prof. J. Fessler's toolbox)[http://web.eecs.umich.edu/~fessler/code/) to allow parfor acceleration - but it seems that with the current parameters of the NUFFT this doesn't actually speed up the calculation, so I have removed it from being the default behaviour.

Benchmarking the NUFFT as it is currently implemented, it takes around 12s to apply to the example data at 1 mm resolution, and around 70s for the 600 um data. This could clearly be made faster by using the GPU implementation of the NUFFT which is already available - but requires suitable hardware, and when I briefly had access to a suitable graphics card I found that I ran out of memory for the matrix size I was trying to use. The way forward here is probably to get a really good graphics card and then see what matrix size it can cope with :)

@dgallichan
Copy link
Owner Author

Of course, if you use a GPU for each NUFFT then you probably can't use parfor in the RF coils dimension, so you may not gain much overall...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant