Skip to content

Add documentation on L1 cache getting out of sync when using multiple instances #34083

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
dukesteen opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@dukesteen
Copy link

dukesteen commented Nov 12, 2024

Description

The current documentation for HybridCache does not adequately warn developers about the risk of L1 cache getting out of sync when invalidating cache entries from another instance. Consider the following example:

Instance 1
 - memorycache with tenant id 1 inside
 - redis cache nothing inside
Instance 2
 - memorycache with nothing inside
 - redis cache also nothing inside

Now instance 2 does an update on the tenant and invalidates both the redis and local cache, which gives you the following situation

Instance 1
 - memorycache with tenant id 1 inside
 - redis cache also has tenant id 1 inside
Instance 2
 - memorycache with tenant id 1 inside
 - redis cache also has tenant id 1 inside

Instance 1's layer 1 cache is now out of sync, and can respond to requests with the wrong data. This can be catastrophic if instance 2 removed access for a user while instance 1 is still serving requests for this user as if they were active.

Related issue: dotnet/aspnetcore#55308

Page URL

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/performance/caching/hybrid?view=aspnetcore-9.0

Content source URL

https://github.com/dotnet/AspNetCore.Docs/blob/main/aspnetcore/performance/caching/hybrid.md

Document ID

fdd3c6f2-c3f4-6fc7-0928-0b18ba9297cf

Article author

@tdykstra

Related Issues

@tdykstra
Copy link
Contributor

cc @mgravell

@Rick-Anderson
Copy link
Contributor

Moved to dotnet/extensions#5674

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants