Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hi @Rasic10 , when you move to .NET core, many dependencies that we're bundled with the OS for .NET Framework become explicit application dependencies. So you will see more DLLS included like those you've mentioned. There's no way to avoid this. If you have any other specific questions or concerns please let me know. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
We are in the process of migrating a .NET Framework application to .NET Core, aiming to support both platforms during the transition to ensure a seamless experience for our clients.
As part of this migration, we are upgrading from System.Data.SqlClient to Microsoft.Data.SqlClient to align with the latest standards and prepare the application for compatibility with .NET 9.
During the migration, we encountered an issue where additional assemblies are being included in the build output. These additional DLLs, which are introduced due to the dependency on Microsoft.Data.SqlClient, include:
...
We are investigating ways to avoid these dependencies, any ideas?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions