|
| 1 | +# Friday Core LLM Workspace |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +This folder defines the initial architecture for building a custom assistant stack inspired by the Tony Stark / Friday concept: a fast, multimodal, context-aware assistant with tool use, memory, and safety boundaries. |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +## Goals |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +- Build a compact, trainable language model foundation for conversational assistance. |
| 8 | +- Add orchestration layers for memory, tools, and action execution. |
| 9 | +- Keep the design modular so it can evolve from local experiments to a production-grade assistant. |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +## Proposed Structure |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +- core/: shared tokenizer, config, model interfaces, and runtime utilities. |
| 14 | +- models/: model definitions, checkpoints, and architecture variants. |
| 15 | +- training/: data pipelines, tokenizer training, pretraining and fine-tuning scripts. |
| 16 | +- inference/: serving, batching, streaming, and prompt execution logic. |
| 17 | +- agents/: planner/executor patterns for tool-calling and multi-step reasoning. |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +## Recommended Infrastructure |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +### 1. Runtime |
| 22 | +- Python 3.11+ |
| 23 | +- PyTorch or JAX for training and inference |
| 24 | +- Hugging Face Transformers for rapid prototyping |
| 25 | +- vLLM or TensorRT-LLM for optimized serving later |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +### 2. Data and Memory |
| 28 | +- Structured memory store for long-term facts |
| 29 | +- Episodic memory for recent conversations |
| 30 | +- Vector database for semantic retrieval |
| 31 | +- Event bus integration for tool and sensor subscriptions |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +### 3. Tooling and Services |
| 34 | +- Plugin interface for commands, APIs, and device control |
| 35 | +- Safety policy layer before action execution |
| 36 | +- Logging and observability for prompts, tool calls, and errors |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +### 4. Deployment |
| 39 | +- Local development first |
| 40 | +- Containerized inference service |
| 41 | +- Optional GPU-backed training environment |
| 42 | +- Edge deployment path for low-latency assistant use |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +## Phased Roadmap |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +### Phase 1: Foundations |
| 47 | +- Define the model interface and configuration schema |
| 48 | +- Build tokenizer and prompt templates |
| 49 | +- Create a minimal inference loop |
| 50 | +- Wire the assistant to the existing memory and plugin layers |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +### Phase 2: Capability Expansion |
| 53 | +- Add retrieval-augmented generation |
| 54 | +- Introduce tool calling and function routing |
| 55 | +- Support multimodal inputs such as voice and visual context |
| 56 | +- Add conversation state management |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +### Phase 3: Personality and Alignment |
| 59 | +- Fine-tune on domain-specific assistant behavior |
| 60 | +- Add safety policies and refusal handling |
| 61 | +- Improve memory selection and personalization |
| 62 | +- Optimize latency and response quality |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +### Phase 4: Stark-like Assistant Experience |
| 65 | +- High-speed voice interaction |
| 66 | +- Context-aware proactive suggestions |
| 67 | +- Multi-agent collaboration for planning and execution |
| 68 | +- Deep integration with robotics, dashboards, and hardware tools |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +## Technical Decisions |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +### Why a modular architecture? |
| 73 | +A modular design allows you to experiment with model variants without rewriting the assistant runtime. |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +### Why start with a small foundation model? |
| 76 | +A smaller model is easier to iterate on and is ideal for local development before scaling to larger architectures. |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +### Why separate training and inference? |
| 79 | +Training and inference have different dependencies, performance characteristics, and deployment constraints. |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +### Why integrate memory and tools early? |
| 82 | +An assistant feels intelligent when it can recall context and perform actions, not just generate text. |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +## Suggested First Implementation |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +1. Create a minimal model wrapper class. |
| 87 | +2. Add a prompt builder for system, user, and tool context. |
| 88 | +3. Connect the LLM to a simple in-memory conversation store. |
| 89 | +4. Add one tool plugin such as a weather lookup or command runner. |
| 90 | +5. Expose a basic chat endpoint. |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +## Notes |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +This is an initial blueprint. The long-term ambition is a Friday-like assistant that can reason, remember, act, and coordinate across the Stark ecosystem. |
0 commit comments